The short version

From the latest prices and each company's SEC filings. Who's ahead on each measure, not which to buy.

  • Waters is the larger company, worth $42.6B, close to Illumina's $41.1B.
  • Waters grew revenue faster over the last year (+113.3% vs +9.4%).
  • Illumina keeps more of each dollar of revenue as operating profit (19.6% vs 7.1%).
  • On earnings, Illumina is the cheaper stock (49.4x vs 108.7x).
  • Waters's price assumes faster free cash flow growth: about 23% a year, against 15% for Illumina (reverse DCF).

Side by side

The stronger figure is shaded where higher (or, for valuation multiples, lower) reads as better. How the implied growth works.

MeasureILMNWAT
Market cap$41.1B$42.6B
Share price$278.17$435.99
Revenue (last fiscal year)$4.3B$3.2B
Free cash flow (last fiscal year)$931M$540M
Revenue growth, last year+9.4%+113.3%
Revenue growth per year, last 5 fiscal years-1.0%+3.2%
Operating margin19.6%7.1%
Net margin18.4%3.6%
Return on equity29.1%1.1%
P/E (trailing)49.4x108.7x
Price / free cash flow44.2x78.9x
EV / EBITDA30.8x49.2x
FCF growth the price implies15.4%23.1%
Dividend yield——
Debt / equity1.34x0.63x
Fundamental gradeCD
Superinvestors holding it610
Insider purchases, last 12 months63

Results from SEC filings

Revenue and free cash flow by fiscal year, from each company's 10-K filings.

Illumina

YearRevenueFree cash flowOp. margin
2021$4.5B$337M-2.7%
2022$4.6B$106M-91.2%
2023$4.5B$283M-23.7%
2024$4.4B$709M-19.1%
2025$4.3B$931M18.6%

Waters

YearRevenueFree cash flowOp. margin
2021$2.8B—29.5%
2022$3.0B—29.4%
2023$3.0B$442M27.7%
2024$3.0B$620M27.9%
2025$3.2B$540M25.4%

Where the revenue comes from

Illumina · by segments, 2025

Sequencing$4.0B92%
Microarray$358M8%

Waters · by products, 2025

Product$2.0B62%
Service$1.2B38%
Compare them in fullFifteen years of statements, quarterly results, DCF and IRR models, and any number of peers side by side.
Open ILMN in Investingly

Questions

Which is bigger, Illumina or Waters?

Waters (WAT), at $42.6B against $41.1B.

Is ILMN or WAT cheaper?

By trailing P/E, Illumina (49.4x) is cheaper than Waters (108.7x). A lower multiple can also mean the market expects less growth.

Which grows faster, ILMN or WAT?

Waters: revenue grew +113.3% over the last year, against +9.4%.

Prices and ratios as of the last daily update; statements from SEC filings. Information only, not investment advice.