The short version

From the latest prices and each company's SEC filings. Who's ahead on each measure, not which to buy.

  • Ferrovial SE is the larger company, worth $35.4B, about 2.6 times Sterling Construction Company.
  • Sterling Construction Company grew revenue faster over the last year (+90.1% vs +5.2%).
  • On earnings, Ferrovial SE is the cheaper stock (36.6x vs 39.0x).

Side by side

The stronger figure is shaded where higher (or, for valuation multiples, lower) reads as better. How the implied growth works.

MeasureFERSTRL
Market cap$35.4B$13.4B
Share price$50.15$513.00
Revenue (last fiscal year)$9.6B$2.5B
Free cash flow (last fiscal year)—$363M
Revenue growth, last year+5.2%+90.1%
Revenue growth per year, last 5 fiscal years+8.4%+15.2%
Operating margin—17.5%
Net margin9.2%12.6%
Return on equity15.0%31.8%
P/E (trailing)36.6x39.0x
Price / free cash flow20.4x37.0x
EV / EBITDA40.9x43.7x
FCF growth the price implies—13.0%
Dividend yield——
Debt / equity3.34x1.33x
Fundamental gradeDC
Superinvestors holding it24
Insider purchases, last 12 months00

Results from SEC filings

Revenue and free cash flow by fiscal year, from each company's 10-K filings.

Ferrovial SE

YearRevenueFree cash flowOp. margin
2022$7.6B—5.6%
2023$8.5B—7.3%
2024$9.1B—34.0%
2025$9.6B——

Sterling Construction Company

YearRevenueFree cash flowOp. margin
2021$1.4B$112M7.6%
2022$1.8B$158M9.0%
2023$2.0B$414M10.4%
2024$2.1B$416M12.5%
2025$2.5B$363M16.3%

Where the revenue comes from

Ferrovial SE · by segments, 2025

Construction division$7.7B77%
Toll roads division$1.4B14%
Corporation division$460M5%
Energy and mobility infrastructures division$339M3%
Airports division$111M1%

Sterling Construction Company · by segments, 2025

E-Infrastructure Solutions$1.5B59%
Transportation Solutions$641M26%
Building Solutions$383M15%
Compare them in fullFifteen years of statements, quarterly results, DCF and IRR models, and any number of peers side by side.
Open FER in Investingly

Questions

Which is bigger, Ferrovial SE or Sterling Construction Company?

Ferrovial SE (FER), at $35.4B against $13.4B.

Is FER or STRL cheaper?

By trailing P/E, Ferrovial SE (36.6x) is cheaper than Sterling Construction Company (39.0x). A lower multiple can also mean the market expects less growth.

Which grows faster, FER or STRL?

Sterling Construction Company: revenue grew +90.1% over the last year, against +5.2%.

Prices and ratios as of the last daily update; statements from SEC filings. Information only, not investment advice.