The short version

From the latest prices and each company's SEC filings. Who's ahead on each measure, not which to buy.

  • Canadian Natural Resources is the larger company, worth $105.3B, about 1.9 times Diamondback Energy.
  • Diamondback Energy grew revenue faster over the last year (+51.2% vs +8.7%).
  • On earnings, Canadian Natural Resources is the cheaper stock (12.4x vs 197.0x).

Side by side

The stronger figure is shaded where higher (or, for valuation multiples, lower) reads as better. How the implied growth works.

MeasureCNQFANG
Market cap$105.3B$54.3B
Share price$49.65$192.13
Revenue (last fiscal year)$38.8B$15.0B
Free cash flow (last fiscal year)——
Revenue growth, last year+8.7%+51.2%
Revenue growth per year, last 5 fiscal years+6.6%+22.2%
Operating margin—6.3%
Net margin27.9%8.6%
Return on equity24.4%3.9%
P/E (trailing)12.4x197.0x
Price / free cash flow12.5x10.4x
EV / EBITDA6.54x9.60x
FCF growth the price implies——
Dividend yield4.8%2.1%
Debt / equity1.07x0.69x
Fundamental gradeBC
Superinvestors holding it59
Insider purchases, last 12 months00

Results from SEC filings

Revenue and free cash flow by fiscal year, from each company's 10-K filings.

Canadian Natural Resources

YearRevenueFree cash flowOp. margin
2021$30.1B——
2022$42.3B——
2023$36.0B——
2024$35.7B——
2025$38.8B——

Diamondback Energy

YearRevenueFree cash flowOp. margin
2021$6.7B—59.3%
2022$9.6B—68.0%
2023$8.4B—54.3%
2024$11.1B—39.7%
2025$15.0B—8.4%

Where the revenue comes from

Canadian Natural Resources · by segments, 2025

North America$19.0B50%
Oil Sands Mining and Upgrading$17.4B46%
Midstream and Refining$761M2%
North Sea$337M1%
Offshore Africa$187M0%

Diamondback Energy · by segments, 2023

Upstream$8.3B99%
All Other$68M1%
Compare them in fullFifteen years of statements, quarterly results, DCF and IRR models, and any number of peers side by side.
Open CNQ in Investingly

Questions

Which is bigger, Canadian Natural Resources or Diamondback Energy?

Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), at $105.3B against $54.3B.

Is CNQ or FANG cheaper?

By trailing P/E, Canadian Natural Resources (12.4x) is cheaper than Diamondback Energy (197.0x). A lower multiple can also mean the market expects less growth.

Which grows faster, CNQ or FANG?

Diamondback Energy: revenue grew +51.2% over the last year, against +8.7%.

Prices and ratios as of the last daily update; statements from SEC filings. Information only, not investment advice.