AGCO vs OSK: AGCO and Oshkosh compared
The short version
From the latest prices and each company's SEC filings. Who's ahead on each measure, not which to buy.
- Oshkosh is the larger company, worth $7.4B, close to AGCO's $7.3B.
- Oshkosh grew revenue faster over the last year (+0.2% vs -1.0%).
- Oshkosh keeps more of each dollar of revenue as operating profit (8.1% vs 5.8%).
- On earnings, AGCO is the cheaper stock (9.7x vs 13.3x).
- Oshkosh's price assumes faster free cash flow growth: about -2% a year, against -4% for AGCO (reverse DCF).
Side by side
The stronger figure is shaded where higher (or, for valuation multiples, lower) reads as better. How the implied growth works.
| Measure | AGCO | OSK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $7.3B | $7.4B |
| Share price | $103.28 | $125.23 |
| Revenue (last fiscal year) | $10.1B | $10.4B |
| Free cash flow (last fiscal year) | $740M | $618M |
| Revenue growth, last year | -1.0% | +0.2% |
| Revenue growth per year, last 5 fiscal years | -2.5% | +7.7% |
| Operating margin | 5.8% | 8.1% |
| Net margin | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Return on equity | 13.1% | 12.9% |
| P/E (trailing) | 9.73x | 13.3x |
| Price / free cash flow | 9.87x | 12.0x |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.84x | 7.65x |
| FCF growth the price implies | -4.4% | -1.7% |
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 1.7% |
| Debt / equity | 1.84x | 1.23x |
| Fundamental grade | D | C |
| Superinvestors holding it | 4 | 8 |
| Insider purchases, last 12 months | 0 | 2 |
Results from SEC filings
Revenue and free cash flow by fiscal year, from each company's 10-K filings.
AGCO
| Year | Revenue | Free cash flow | Op. margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $11.1B | $390M | 9.0% |
| 2022 | $12.7B | $450M | 10.0% |
| 2023 | $14.4B | $585M | 11.8% |
| 2024 | $11.7B | $297M | -1.0% |
| 2025 | $10.1B | $740M | 5.9% |
Oshkosh
| Year | Revenue | Free cash flow | Op. margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $7.7B | $1.1B | 7.7% |
| 2022 | $8.3B | $332M | 4.5% |
| 2023 | $9.7B | $274M | 8.7% |
| 2024 | $10.7B | $269M | 9.4% |
| 2025 | $10.4B | $618M | 9.0% |
Where the revenue comes from
AGCO · by products, 2025
Tractors$6.7B66%
Replacement parts$1.9B19%
Combines, application equipment and other machinery$1.5B15%
Grain storage and protein production systems$1M0%
Oshkosh · by segments, 2025
Access$4.5B43%
Vocational Segment$3.7B36%
Transport$2.1B20%
Corporate and Other$104M1%
Compare them in fullFifteen years of statements, quarterly results, DCF and IRR models, and any number of peers side by side.
Open AGCO in InvestinglyQuestions
Which is bigger, AGCO or Oshkosh?
Oshkosh (OSK), at $7.4B against $7.3B.
Is AGCO or OSK cheaper?
By trailing P/E, AGCO (9.73x) is cheaper than Oshkosh (13.3x). A lower multiple can also mean the market expects less growth.
Which grows faster, AGCO or OSK?
Oshkosh: revenue grew +0.2% over the last year, against -1.0%.
Prices and ratios as of the last daily update; statements from SEC filings. Information only, not investment advice.